SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
TLM, TORS and RT in early supraglottic SCC: a meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Management of early stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) evolved with the advent of transoral surgical and new radiation techniques. Current guidelines recommend a single therapeutic modality treatment (either organ-sparing surgery or definitive radiotherapy) yet the optimal approach remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare long-term (five years) oncological and functional outcomes in early SCC. Two independent reviewers screened the literature available on Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar (1990-2025). Eligible studies included patients with early SCC (T1-T2/N0-N1/M0), treated with transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or Radiotherapy (RT). A systematic review with comprehensive meta-analysis were performed using RⒸ software. 59 studies were included: 19 RT; 30 TLM, 6 TORS and four on mixed treatment studies. Five-year overall survival favored surgical approaches, particularly TORS, with rates of 78% for TORS, 72% for TLM compared with 55% for RT. Swallowing outcomes and Quality-of-Life (QoL) assessments were heterogeneous and not directly comparable. Available functional data (tracheostomy, gastrostomy and total laryngectomy rates) showed similar results across techniques. Meta-regression analyses adjusting for tumor stage, treatment period and use of adjuvant RT confirmed these findings. TORS and TLM appear to be associated with improved overall survival and comparable functional results compared with 2D/3D RT. Further comparisons of modern (intensity modulated) RT and TORS are needed, based on more robust studies including a larger number of patients. QoL and swallowing data remain limited and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for prospective studies using validated assessment tools, comorbidity analysis and multiple treatment arms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42321527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.