Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321526›Full record

SynthesisMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2026

A priori sample size determination and power analysis in metabolic phenotyping and integrative metabolomics: an application framework based on a systematic review of literature.

Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Sara Dobani, José Fernando Rinaldi de Alvarenga, Cristiana Mignogna, Daniele Del Rio, Pedro Mena

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola Luigi BragazziHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, Medical School, University of Parma, Building C, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8409-868X
Sara DobaniHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, Medical School, University of Parma, Building C, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy. sara.dobani@unipr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-7174
José Fernando Rinaldi de AlvarengaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, Medical School, University of Parma, Building C, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-1873
Cristiana MignognaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, Medical School, University of Parma, Building C, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-6040
Daniele Del RioHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, Medical School, University of Parma, Building C, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5394-1259
Pedro MenaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, Medical School, University of Parma, Building C, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-2977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biomedical research, predetermining the appropriate number of samples is essential to ensure the validity of findings, optimize resource allocation, and support meaningful scientific discovery. Accurate sample size estimation is particularly critical in complex study designs, such as those found in metabolomics, including metabolic phenotyping and integrative metabolomics. However, this task remains challenging due to the high dimensionality and variability inherent in metabolomics data. In recent years, efforts have been made to devise techniques and applications that could assist in designing and implementing metabolomics studies. Despite these efforts, a comprehensive evaluation of existing approaches is lacking, limiting the guidance available to researchers and potentially hindering progress in the field. To address this gap, a systematic literature review was conducted, mining two major scholarly databases (Scopus and MEDLINE via PubMed) and identifying twenty relevant studies. This review aims to provide an overview of the currently available methodologies for conducting a priori sample size calculations and power analyses in metabolomics, while also highlighting ongoing challenges and outlining directions for future research.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsHumansPhenotypeResearch DesignSample SizeMetabotypesMulti-omicsPower calculationSample size estimation

Identifiers

PMID42321526
PMCPMC13282238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.