ArticleDrugs & aging2026
Development and Validation of Prescribing Appropriateness Criteria (PAC) for Sri Lankan Older Adults.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate prescribing in Sri Lankan older adults, contributes to adverse drug events, hospital admissions and increased healthcare expenditure. Although international tools exist to assess prescribing appropriateness in older adults, their direct application in Sri Lanka is limited by differences in clinical practices, resource constraints and variability in medicine availability.
objectiveWe aimed to develop and validate country-specific prescription appropriateness criteria for Sri Lankan older adults, focusing on prevalent diseases.
methodsA literature review was conducted to develop a preliminary list of criteria, which was scrutinised by three internal reviewers. The criteria were then validated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). A multidisciplinary Sri Lankan panel (medical specialists, hospital pharmacists and pharmacy academics) completed three rounds of ratings involving 15, 11 and 7 panellists, respectively.
resultsThe preliminary list contained 38 criteria; all were rated appropriate in round one, with clarity amendments suggested for seven criteria. Two additional criteria were proposed and accepted, producing a final set of 40 criteria. The criteria most frequently addressed medicines used for cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus, with additional focus on pain, musculoskeletal and bone health, asthma and neuropsychiatric disorders. Criteria not commonly included in international tools covered gabapentinoid prescribing for pain with renal dose adjustment, corticosteroid-associated glycaemic monitoring with antihyperglycaemic dose adjustment and blood monitoring requirements for methotrexate therapy.
conclusionsThese criteria provide a context-specific framework to support safer prescribing for older adults in Sri Lanka. Their integration into clinical practice and pharmacist-led medication reviews could reduce medication-related problems and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.