ReviewApoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death2026
Apoptotic bodies in bone homeostasis and skeletal disease: biology and therapeutic implications.
Review in Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone is among the most apoptotically active tissues in the body. During remodeling, repair, and disease, dying osteoclasts, osteoblast-lineage cells, osteocytes, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, and injury-associated cells release apoptotic bodies (ABs) that retain parent-cell-derived cargo and surface ligands. These vesicles are increasingly viewed not only as debris for efferocytic clearance but also as source-specific signalling units that shape skeletal cell fate, immune activity, mineralization, and repair. This review integrates current evidence for ABs across skeletal homeostasis and disease. We first define ABs within the broader extracellular vesicle landscape, emphasizing vesicle heterogeneity, isolation and characterization challenges, and terminology boundaries. We then examine AB sources and recipient interfaces, including osteoclasts, osteoblast-lineage cells, osteocytes, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, platelet-derived ABs in injury repair, macrophages, osteoclast phagocytes, chondrocytes, and bone lining cells. We further discuss how dysregulated AB signalling contributes to osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and bone metastasis, as well as alveolar bone destruction, aging-related bone loss, osteochondral mineralization, and bone injury repair. We highlight therapeutic implications, including AB-based or AB-inspired strategies, the cathepsin K (CTSK)-responsive self-assembling peptide nanoparticle OsteoSAVE for in vivo generation of osteoclast-derived ABs, and the hypothesis that antiresorptive therapies may reshape osteoclast-derived AB (OC-AB) production. We also identify unresolved translational questions, including AB lifespan, circulation, source attribution, and direct human validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42321445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.