Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321396›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2026

The electrofluidic brain as a basement layer for neural computation.

V Srinivasa Chakravarthy, Vigneswaran Chandrasekaran, Nagesh C Shanbhag

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V Srinivasa ChakravarthyDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India. schakra@ee.iitm.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-2453-1637
Vigneswaran ChandrasekaranDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-9305
Nagesh C ShanbhagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India. nagesh.c.shanbhag@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-8783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reappraises brain function by reconsidering the role of cerebral fluid dynamics in cognition. Tracing a lineage from early modern thinkers like Descartes-who invoked hydraulic metaphors and 'animal spirits'-to J.C. Bose's pioneering studies on electro-mechanical plant physiology, and culminating in contemporary findings on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), extracellular space (ECS), and neurovascular coupling, we reveal a forgotten yet vital computational substrate. We argue that alongside the well-studied digital operations of neural circuits exists a slower, analog, evolutionarily older layer of electrofluidic computation. This system-comprised of ionic diffusion, convective CSF flow, and vascular modulation-not only supports but dynamically shapes neural activity. The brain emerges as an electromechanical ecology of electric pulses and fluid flows, where the mind is both a pattern of neural activity and a choreography of fluid flows.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionAnimalsHumansHydrodynamicsModels, NeurologicalNeurons

Identifiers

PMID42321396
PMCPMC13282405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.