ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Fine-tuning large language models to generate single-atom catalyst synthesis procedures.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heterogeneous catalyst design is primarily expert-driven and difficult to keep track amidst rapidly growing literature, motivating the use of large language models (LLMs) to learn from existing knowledge. While generalist LLMs show some capability in generating synthesis procedures, they struggle on encountering complex catalytic systems like single-atom catalysts (SAC). Here, we investigate fine-tuning of LLMs to improve the generation of SAC synthesis procedures with chemical relevance. We curate a dataset of 2,964 SAC publications and train the Granite-based LLM to recommend protocols based on user-defined prompts including metal-support combinations, synthesis method, and target reactions. We demonstrate the model's practicality through a user interface allowing researchers to query procedures tailored to their design conditions. Human-in-the-loop validation of 150 model-generated SAC protocols confirmed coherent, context-aware procedures with synthesis sequence steps that align with experimental logic, along with limitations. We underscore LLM-generated protocols must be critically reviewed and used as assistive tools, and highlight fine-tuned LLMs for AI-assisted synthesis planning driving innovation in catalysis research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.