Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321369›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026

Animal models of spinal cord injury in neuro-urological research.

Alice Giannotti, Daniel Medina Aguinaga, Ana Ferreira, Charles H Hubscher, Célia Duarte Cruz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alice GiannottiBiorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
Daniel Medina AguinagaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-2998
Ana FerreiraDepartment of Biomedicine, Experimental Biology Unit, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-2537
Charles H HubscherKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Louisville, KY, USA.
Célia Duarte CruzDepartment of Biomedicine, Experimental Biology Unit, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. ccruz@med.up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8922-5713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-changing and costly condition. SCI causes major disturbances in sensory, motor and autonomic function, resulting in permanent loss of function and strongly affecting the physical, psychological and social well-being of patients and caregivers. A particularly debilitating consequence of SCI is loss of voluntary control over bladder function, which substantially affects patients' dignity, health and quality of life. Current understanding of the complex pathophysiological mechanisms of SCI and associated comorbidities has heavily relied on the use of animal models, which have also been crucial in devising new therapeutic approaches and fine-tuning existent ones. However, a debate about the persistent challenges in translating preclinical data into treatment is ongoing. Technological advances are generating innovative modelling approaches with the support of regulatory bodies, aiming to reduce or eventually substitute animal use. In this Review, we address the current use of animal SCI models in neuro-urological research and debate whether we will still be using these models by 2035.

Identifiers

PMID42321369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.