Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321366›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning model for predicting rebleeding risk after endoscopic variceal ligation in esophageal variceal bleeding.

Junyi Zhan, Keqiang Lu, Jinzhong Yu, Jie Chen, Feifei Xing, Dexin Wang, Shihao Zhang, Mingyan Yang, Ping Liu, Jian Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Junyi Zhan *Cell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Keqiang Lu *Cell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Jinzhong YuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Feifei XingCell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Dexin WangCell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Shihao ZhangCell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Mingyan YangCell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Ping LiuCell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. wang.jian@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Yongping MuCell Biology Laboratory, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), 528, Zhangheng Road, Pudong District, Shanghai, 201203, China. ypmu8888@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6808-8243

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81874390Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 22S11901700Shanghai Natural Science Foundation 21ZR1464100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rebleeding is a severe complication following recovery from esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB), yet robust predictive tools for assessing post-treatment risk after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) therapy remain scarce. This study developed and independently validated a machine learning (ML) model using multidimensional clinical data to predict 1-year rebleeding risk. Two independent cohorts were included: a retrospective cohort (n = 373) for model development and a prospective cohort (n = 119) for validation, with a one-year rebleeding endpoint. Predictors were identified using Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and eight ML algorithms were evaluated. Each algorithm was optimized via 5-fold cross-validation. The model with optimal performance was chosen to develop an online computational platform. RFE identified eight key predictors. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance in both the training and validation cohorts, achieving AUCs of 0.883 and 0.887, respectively. This model was subsequently implemented in an online clinical platform for individualized 1-year rebleeding risk assessment. Our findings establish XGBoost as an effective tool for predicting EVB rebleeding risk, providing an evidence-based decision aid for post-EVL management.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesGastrointestinal HemorrhageMachine LearningAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentEndoscopic variceal ligationEsophageal variceal bleedingMachine learningPrediction modelRebleeding

Identifiers

PMID42321366
PMCPMC13554231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.