ArticleScientific reports2026
Selphi, a tool for improving genotype imputation accuracy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotype imputation is a powerful tool for inferring missing genotype data in large-scale genetic studies. Over the last two decades, multiple imputation algorithms have been developed, steadily improving in speed and overall accuracy. However, accurate imputation of rare and infrequent variants remains a challenge, largely because existing methods rely on local haplotype matching within genomic windows and do not fully exploit the extended patterns of haplotype sharing that span entire chromosomes. Here we present Selphi, a new genotype imputation algorithm that combines the Positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform (PBWT) with a multi-stage haplotype selection heuristic operating across entire chromosomes. When compared to state-of-the-art methods Beagle 5.4, IMPUTE5, and Minimac4, Selphi showed higher accuracy on the 1000 Genomes Project and TOPMed datasets, across all super-populations and allele frequencies. Similarly, Selphi achieved higher accuracy than Beagle 5.4 on the UK Biobank dataset, which translated into improved concordance with hc-WGS GWAS summary statistics at known trait-associated loci and more accurate polygenic risk scores (PRS). Selphi outputs standard VCF files with genotype dosages (DS), haplotype-specific allele probabilities (AP1, AP2), and a per-variant dosage R-squared quality score (DR2), enabling direct integration with downstream analytical pipelines including standard post-imputation quality filtering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.