ArticleScientific reports2026
Predictability of sleep slow oscillation emergence and spatial extent from pre-onset neural dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slow oscillations (SOs; ~ 0.5-1.5 Hz) are a hallmark of non-rapid eye movement sleep and are known to support memory consolidation. Although their dynamics are well characterized, processes that precede SO initiation and predict their spatial extent remain largely unknown, despite their potential utility for closed-loop intervention. Using high-density EEG from 29 healthy adults, we examined neural activity in the 2-s interval preceding the SO trough. SOs were classified into Global and Frontal subtypes, which differ in propagation. We quantified instantaneous spectral power, time-frequency dynamics, and cross-frequency coupling including phase-amplitude coupling (PAC). Theta-band power (4-8 Hz) emerged as the strongest individual predictor of SO initiation, although delta-band activity provided complementary predictive information. Spectral parameterization indicated that this pre-onset theta-band elevation primarily reflects broadband shifts in the aperiodic background rather than a modulation of a discrete oscillatory component. Theta-band power exhibited a sustained rise beginning ~ 1.6 s before onset and differentiated SO subtypes with moderate-to-strong effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.45-0.77). Mechanistically, Global SOs were preceded by enhanced delta-theta PAC and broad low-frequency synchronization, whereas Frontal SOs showed elevated theta/alpha-to-beta/low-gamma coupling, reflecting locally enhanced coupling that restricts propagation. A logistic regression classifier using pre-onset theta power achieved > 95% accuracy distinguishing SOs from surrogate events and ~ 83% accuracy differentiating SO subtypes. These findings demonstrate that pre-onset low-frequency spectral dynamics, particularly theta-band power, can predict SO occurrence and might be leveraged in neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.