ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and properties of composite coatings for surface repair of cement concrete pavements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated high-pressure water rubber removal can damage the surface texture of airport cement concrete pavements and reduce skid resistance. To address this problem, three composite coating systems, namely styrene-acrylic copolymer emulsion (H), water-based epoxy (S), and pure water (N), were developed and evaluated by laboratory tests. Within the tested thickness range, the pull-off force reached its maximum at a coating thickness of 3 mm, and the S coating showed the highest adhesion to concrete. Compared with the uncoated surface, the mean profile depth increased by 84.3, 60.0, and 32.8% for the H, S, and N coatings, respectively, while the slope spectral density peak wavelength shifted from 1.78 to 0.5-0.6 mm. The British Pendulum Number increased by 39.5, 31.8, and 21.5% for the H, S, and N coatings, respectively, and showed a strong positive correlation with mean profile depth (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.