Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321307›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Regenerative repair is connected to early and specific structural, immune, and metabolic MSC signatures in adult mammals.

Miguel Thomas, Anastasia Pacary, Emmanuelle Arnaud, David Bernard, Cathy Maugis-Rabusseau, Christophe Guissard, Adèle Arlat, Noélie Davezac, Anne Lorsignol, Jenny Paupert and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Miguel ThomasUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Anastasia PacaryUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Emmanuelle ArnaudUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
David BernardUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Cathy Maugis-RabusseauUniv Toulouse, INSA Toulouse, CNRS, IMT, Toulouse, France.
Christophe GuissardUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Adèle ArlatUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Noélie DavezacUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Anne LorsignolUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Jenny PaupertUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Elsa Gratianne GuillotCancer Research Center of Lyon, Computational Biology Division, Léon Bérard Center, INSERM U1052-CNRS9, UMR5286, Claude Bernard Lyon1 University, Lyon, France.
Arnaud BonnaffouxCancer Research Center of Lyon, Computational Biology Division, Léon Bérard Center, INSERM U1052-CNRS9, UMR5286, Claude Bernard Lyon1 University, Lyon, France.
Béatrice CousinUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Valérie Planat-BenardUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Paul MonsarratUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France.
Louis CasteillaUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France. louis.casteilla@inserm.fr.
Marielle OussetUniversity of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5070, INSERM U1301, EFS, ENVT, Institut RESTORE, Toulouse, France. marielle.ousset@inserm.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-2729

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE45-0024-01ECELLFrance France 2030 / ANR-24-INSB-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult mammals exhibit a limited capacity for tissue regeneration following injury and typically heal through scar formation. Mesenchymal stem/stroma cells (MSCs), which are phenotypically plastic and ubiquitous across tissues, play a critical role in maintaining tissue architecture during repair. We hypothesized that early events in regenerative and non-regenerative repair involve changes in MSC heterogeneity, which in turn determine repair outcomes. To test this hypothesis, we performed extensive single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in a mouse model of tissue injury. This model standardizes the comparison of non-regenerative and regenerative repair in adults with identical developmental stages and genetic backgrounds. Our analysis of MSCs during the early phases of tissue repair in adult mammals enabled the identification of distinct regenerative and non-regenerative MSC clusters, suggesting that specific MSC states may actively drive tissue repair outcomes. Furthermore, unsupervised approaches allowed us to revisit the functional signatures of MSCs centering on their impact on tissue structure (S), inflammation/immunity (I) and metabolism (M). By integrating these S, I and M functions, the SIM framework provides a conceptual model to interpret MSC behavior as a coordinated tissue-level response rather than a collection of isolated pleiotropic activities. This work positions MSCs at the center of the "SIM" triad, underscoring their pivotal role in tissue repair.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerationWound HealingAnimalsMiceCellular heterogeneityMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)scRNA-seqSIMTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID42321307
PMCPMC13558711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.