ArticleScientific reports2026
Seasonal water quality index prediction in Guilin karst water system: an explainable machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the water quality index (WQI) in karst water systems remains challenging due to pronounced seasonal hydrological heterogeneity, dual-porosity flow regimes, and complex multi-factor pollution mechanisms. This study developed a season-stratified, explainable machine-learning framework for the Guilin karst water system (Guangxi, China), based on 208 samples from 104 stations covering the wet (June to August) and dry (December to February) seasons. A sample-adaptive feature engineering step, followed by a three-stage selection pipeline (Pearson correlation filtering, variance inflation factor (VIF) screening, and Random Forest importance ranking), reduced 16 candidate features to ten predictors per season. Ten base learners (Ridge, Lasso, ElasticNet, support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GBM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), categorical boosting (CatBoost) and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost)) were trained separately for each season, and the top three per season were stacked through a regularised Ridge meta-learner. XGBoost performed best in the wet season (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.