ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative evaluation of neural networks and ensemble models for vegetation trend prediction in a semiarid mountain ecosystem, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates vegetation dynamics in a semiarid mountain ecosystem in southwestern Saudi Arabia from 1990 to 2024 by integrating multisource remote sensing data, bioclimatic variables, and machine learning models. Trends in vegetation greenness (NDVI), water content (NDWI), and land surface temperature (LST) were quantified via Kendall's τ and Sen's slope estimators. To capture fine-scale climatic heterogeneity in complex terrains, CHELSA bioclimatic variables were downscaled from ~ 1 km to 30 m resolution via random forest regression. These predictors were used to model NDVI trend patterns through a comparative framework including a baseline artificial neural network (ANN), metaheuristic-optimized ANN variants (ANN-PSO and ANN-GWO), and ensemble models (random forest and XGBoost). Model performance was assessed via independent validation, error metrics (RMSE, MAE, R²), bootstrap uncertainty analysis, and spatial residual diagnostics. All the models exhibited strong predictive ability, with XGBoost achieving the highest accuracy (RMSE ≈ 0.051; R² ≈ 0.92) and the lowest residual spatial autocorrelation. The spatial results indicate dominant greening across ~ 73-74% of the area, whereas ~ 25% of the area exhibits degradation concentrated in thermal and moisture-stressed zones. These findings highlight the value of integrated spectral-climatic modeling for monitoring vegetation changes in semiarid mountainous environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.