ArticleScientific reports2026
Detecting entanglement in high-spin quantum systems via a stacking ensemble of machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable quantification of quantum entanglement in high-spin or many body systems remains a major computational challenge. Extending machine learning techniques to genuinely high dimensional settings is urgently needed. In this study, we investigate ensemble machine learning as a scalable framework for estimating entanglement, quantified by the negativity, in high-spin quantum systems. We construct a stacked ensemble regressor integrating Neural Networks, XGBoost, and Extra Trees. The model is trained on real-coefficient pure states and mixed Werner states for [Formula: see text], and 5, corresponding to the orthogonal ensemble characteristic of time-reversal-symmetric systems. With CatBoost serving as the meta-learner, the ensemble achieves consistently high predictive accuracy. Statistical validation across five independent random seeds confirms negligible run-to-run variance in all reported metrics. Residual analysis reveals a heteroscedastic error structure: prediction fidelity is highest near [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], with peak variance in the intermediate regime ([Formula: see text]-0.7). Empirical scaling laws for training time and memory consumption are derived, showing that the [Formula: see text] growth of the Werner-state feature space poses a scalability ceiling for raw density-matrix representations beyond [Formula: see text]. Moreover, we derive an empirical formula linking the required dataset size to system dimensionality and desired prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that ensemble learning provides a robust and trustworthy tool for characterizing entanglement in high dimensional quantum physics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.