ArticleScientific reports2026
Extension of overlap measures for Multi-Class Biomarker Evaluation in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a progressive disease such as the Alzheimer's disease (AD), the availability of suitable biomarkers tracking the stages of its progression could markedly accelerate drug development by providing an earlier indication of drug efficacy. Investigators use diagnostic tests to classify disease stages into probable Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal cognitive aging. In this paper, we focus on developing a proper statistical overlap measure-based method to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of tests with three diagnostic categories. Parametric and non-parametric approaches for the estimation of the overlap measure (OVL) are presented as well as their bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs). The performance of these estimations and its CIs are evaluated through simulations. Furthermore, it is compared with the Volume Under the ROC Surface (VUS), the most common measure to assess the accuracy of tests with three ordinal diagnostic categories. A neuropsychological data set from a longitudinal cohort study for the detection of biomarkers for identifying stages of Alzheimer's disease is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.