Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321183›Full record

ReviewBlood cancer journal2026

The search for safe and effective CAR-T targets in AML.

Florian Van Oers, Donovan Flumens, Simon Haentjens, Laurens Krekelbergh, Sébastien Anguille

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian Van OersLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5176-3214
Donovan FlumensLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-8300
Simon HaentjensLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9924-1801
Laurens KrekelberghLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0038-9947
Sébastien AnguilleLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. sebastien.anguille@uza.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1951-6715

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 1806225NUniversiteit Antwerpen (University of Antwerp) GRANT MULTPLEXVlaamse Overheid (Government of Flanders) HBC.2024.0265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a highly aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic options and poor long-term survival. A major barrier to curative treatment is the persistence of leukemic stem cells (LSCs), a chemo-resistant population that drives relapse. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of B-cell hematological malignancies. However, its application in AML has been met with significant challenges. Among the key challenges are the scarcity of AML-specific antigens and the risk of on-target/off-tumor toxicity due to shared antigen expression on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and/or mature blood cells. Early clinical trials of CAR-T-cell therapy in AML -primarily targeting CD123, CD33, or CLL‑1- have demonstrated limited durable complete remissions and/or frequent myeloablation, underscoring the need for more selective targets. While other targets show more restricted expression profiles, they are often expressed only in a small subgroup of AML patients. In this review, we systematically evaluated 63 AML-associated antigens for which CAR constructs have been reported, using five criteria: (1) homogeneous expression across AML patients, (2) uniform expression on AML cells within individual patients; (3) presence on LSCs, (4) absence on normal HSCs, and (5) no or acceptable expression on mature blood cells. Applying a 20-point scoring framework, 13 novel antigens emerged as the most promising candidates for CAR-T-cell therapy in AML: ADGRE2, SIGLEC-6, IL1RAP, MUC1, CCR1, CD155, CD70, LILRB4, GRP78, CD37, ITGB2, TIM-3 and mesothelin. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each target, along with strategies to mitigate associated risks. With no CAR-T-cell therapy currently approved for AML, this comprehensive review provides a prioritized antigen landscape and a framework to guide the rational design of next-generation CARs for this challenging malignancy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHumansAntigens, NeoplasmEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID42321183
PMCPMC13526807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.