ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026
Instrument Tracking Reduces Radiation Exposure and Increases Efficiency in Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive spine surgery, particularly lateral lumbar interbody fusion, offers advantages over open surgery, including reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. The prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (PL-LIF) is an evolution of lateral lumbar interbody fusion that enables posterior instrumentation without repositioning, enhances sagittal correction, and may improve operative efficiency. However, concerns remain regarding prolonged psoas retraction and increased radiation exposure. While instrument tracking technologies have improved workflow and reduced radiation in other minimally invasive surgeries, such as minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, their role in PL-LIF remains unstudied. This study evaluates the impact of instrument tracking on psoas retraction time, radiation exposure, and procedural efficiency in PL-LIF.
methodsA retrospective analysis reviewed PL-LIF procedures using instrument tracking technology at a single institution over 7 months. Operative times (minutes), radiation exposure (mGy and number of x-ray images), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. The dataset was divided into temporal quartiles based on the chronological order of surgical cases to evaluate the impact of learning over time. PROMs were also reported.
resultsA total of 52 consecutive PL-LIF levels across 39 patients were included. The surgeon had 2 years of PL-LIF experience but had no prior experience with instrument tracking before the first case in the dataset. Median retractor time across the entire study was 17.43 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.48). From first to final quartile, the median retractor time consistently decreased from 20.9 to 14.7 minutes (-30%,
conclusionsProlonged retractor times and substantial radiation associated with the PL-LIF can be dramatically reduced with instrument tracking. Intraoperative radiation exposure was significantly reduced compared with previous studies, with a minimal number of x-rays images required from study onset. Psoas retraction time significantly decreased after an inflection point at 15 cases, ultimately falling below 15 minutes and correlating with adherence to the recommended 20-minute threshold in 85% of cases during the final quartile. Instrument tracking can substantially decrease retractor time and radiation exposure in PL-LIF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Instrument tracking in PL-LIF improves efficiency and safety, reducing psoas retraction time and radiation while maintaining 12-month PROM gains. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.