Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42320938›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

"It is not something you like to hear, but it is something you have to know". Community preferences for risk communication during pregnancy in the context of an emerging pathogen: a multicountry qualitative study with women in three ZIKV endemic countries who were pregnant during and following ZIKV.

María Consuelo Miranda Montoya, Claudia Milena Hormiga Sánchez, Ester Paiva Souto, Edna Acosta Pérez, Gustavo Matta, Juliana Silva Corrêa, Marcela Daza, Gabriela Gama, Camila Pimentel, Marcela Mercado-Reyes and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

María Consuelo Miranda MontoyaEl Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5730-0723
Claudia Milena Hormiga SánchezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Ester Paiva SoutoOswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8168-8585
Edna Acosta PérezUniversity of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, Graduate School of Public Health, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Gustavo MattaFundacao Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Policy and Administration in Health, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5422-2798
Juliana Silva CorrêaFundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcela DazaInstituto Nacional de Salud, Research Division, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4592-2685
Gabriela GamaProfessor Joaquim Amorim Neto Research Institute (IPESQ), UNIFACISA University Center, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7352-6711
Camila PimentelLaboratory for studies on drugs, vulnerabilities and social markers (LED), Department of Public Health (NESC), Aggeu Magalhães Institute - Fiocruz Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Marcela Mercado-ReyesDirección de Investigación en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogota, Colombia.
Angelica María Amado NiñoFacultad de Salud, Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8313-5469
Elena Marbán-CastroISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luz Marina LeegstraHeidelberger Institut für Global Health, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-9568
Olivia MandersRollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Priscila Cardia PetraPostgraduate Program in Bioethics, Applied Ethics and Collective Health (ENSP-FIOCRUZ); Interdisciplinary Centre for Public Health Emergencies (NIESP-CEE-FIOCRUZ), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lauren MaxwellHeidelberger Institut für Global Health, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany lauren.maxwell.us@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-2092

Funding

NIH National Institutes of Health & NIGMS National Institute of General Medical Sciences U54-GM133807Wellcome Trust 216002/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity values and preferences should inform risk communication during pregnancy in the context of an epidemic of an emerging pathogen, given the high levels of uncertainty in the diagnosis and the probability of an adverse outcome.

methodsWe conducted a multicountry qualitative study with 98 women from 7 sites in Brazil, Colombia and Puerto Rico to understand their preferences for learning about Zika virus test results amid high levels of uncertainty in diagnostic testing and related outcomes. We used thematic analysis with a combined deductive and inductive approach to analyse findings from the in-depth interviews.

findingsAcross sites and time periods, women wanted to learn about their test results, the risk to their pregnancy or infant and the related uncertainty as early as possible. They wanted to separate risk communication from decision-making around the following steps to give them time to consider the test results, related risks and available services.

conclusionsCommunication of the risk associated with an emerging pathogen suspected to affect pregnancy and developmental outcomes is a fraught issue. Public health authorities and healthcare providers should work closely together to understand families' preferences for risk communication in the presence of uncertainty and develop a community-informed plan for risk communication as early as possible during an epidemic of an emerging infectious disease.

Indexed as

CommunicationPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika Virus InfectionAdultBrazilColombiaCommunicable Diseases, EmergingFemaleHumansPregnancyPuerto RicoQualitative ResearchYoung AdultArbovirusesDecision MakingGlobal HealthHealth services researchMaternal health

Identifiers

PMID42320938
PMCPMC13289160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.