ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
A Unified Life Cycle Impact Assessment Framework for Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Decline.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) translates emissions and resource use into a set of environmental impact indicators, forming a key component of life cycle assessments. Current LCIA methods quantify biodiversity loss per pressure-impact pathway separately and at various spatial scales. We developed a new, spatially explicit and scale-consistent LCIA framework and applied it to derive characterization factors (CFs) for the impacts of land use, nitrogen emissions, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on global terrestrial plant diversity. The framework combines the local potentially disappeared fraction of species (LPDF) due to the selected pressures with a multipressure species-area relationship (mp-SAR) model and with information on species endemism to estimate the global PDF (GPDF). For GHG emissions, we provide CFs for 250 GHGs and 20- and 100 year time horizons. Ecoregion-specific CFs of 6 land use types varied by 7 orders of magnitude, while emitting-region-specific CFs of ammonia and nitrogen oxides varied by 2 orders of magnitude. For land use, CF variability was driven almost entirely (>99%) by ecoregion. For nitrogen emissions, emitting region and compound each explained about one-third of the variability. Overall, our LCIA framework allows for consistent scaling of local species loss to global extinction while considering multiple impacts categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.