ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2026
Precision modification of heart failure signaling by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing.
Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and current therapies largely focus on symptom management and slowing disease progression rather than correcting the underlying molecular abnormalities. Recent advances in genome editing technologies have created new opportunities to treat heart failure. Among these approaches, CRISPR-Cas9 base editing has emerged as a particularly promising strategy because it enables precise nucleotide conversions without introducing double-strand DNA breaks and demonstrates relatively high efficiency in vivo. While correction of disease-causing mutations by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing represents an important application of genome editing, an alternative strategy is to directly modulate key signaling pathways that drive cardiac dysfunction. Protein kinase C alpha (PKCα) functions as a key regulator of cardiac contractility and pathological remodeling. Precision editing of phosphorylation sites that control PKCα stability or activation may therefore represent an effective strategy to suppress maladaptive kinase signaling in cardiomyocytes. This concept of "precision signaling modification" may provide a broadly applicable therapeutic approach for heart failure. Similar strategies may also be applicable to other signaling molecules, including Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.