ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2026
Nutrition Services in Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient Experiences, Needs, and Gaps in Care.
Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNutrition influences cancer outcomes, yet access to registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) remains inconsistent. Patient-centered data can reveal gaps in care, unmet needs, and disparities, providing real-world insight into oncology nutrition services.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to characterize cancer survivors' experiences with professional nutrition care since diagnosis, including sources, met and unmet needs, timing, and priority areas, and to examine variation by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
designThe cross-sectional study analyzed online surveys from the Cancer Experience Registry, an online patient-reported outcomes registry of cancer survivors in the United States and Canada, collected between November 2022 and November 2024; analyses of this study were restricted to US participants. PARTICIPANTS/
settingParticipants included 1427 cancer survivors, predominantly women (76.5%), older adults (45.5% aged ≥65 years), and non-Hispanic White survivors (85.5%); smaller proportions identified as non-Hispanic Black (5.6%), Hispanic (3.2%), and non-Hispanic other race (4.3%); and 1.5% were missing. The most common cancers were breast (32.6%), blood (29.6%), and gastrointestinal (10.5%). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Primary outcomes included receipt of nutrition care since cancer diagnosis (ie, any nutrition care and care from an RDN and patient-reported nutrition care need), categorized as met (ie, wanted and received support), unmet (ie, wanted but did not receive support), no perceived need (ie, did not want support), or unsure. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive statistics summarized receipt of nutrition services, expressed need, timing, and priority areas. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses examined differences in nutrition care need and RDN engagement across patient characteristics.
resultsSince diagnosis, 53.6% reported receiving nutrition care, with 39.3% from an RDN. Need was met in 41.0%, unmet in 13.4%, no perceived need in 33.2%, and unsure in 12.5%. Among participants desiring nutrition care, demand peaked during treatment and post-treatment. Unmet need was more common after treatment and was linked to increasing energy level (P = .002), emotional health (P < .001), intentional weight loss (P < .001), and cancer worry (P < .001). Endorsement of symptom management (P = .008) and intentional weight gain (P = .001) as reasons for nutrition support was higher among participants who saw a provider (RDN or non-RDN) compared with those who did not. Participants with unmet needs were more often younger, women, food-insecure, lacking caregiving support, and had higher symptom burden, and no perceived need was associated with rural residence, lower education, lacking caregiver support, and private practice care (all, P < .05).
conclusionsUnmet nutrition care needs were observed among cancer survivors and varied by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Future research should evaluate the impact of systematic malnutrition screening and referral pathways on access to RDN services and examine how nutrition care needs and engagement evolve from diagnosis through survivorship. Additional work is needed to understand and address disparities across population subgroups and care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.