ArticleCell reports methods2026
A high-throughput, end-to-end pipeline for extracellular miRNA biomarker discovery from human biofluids.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a scalable pipeline for extracellular miRNA (ex-miRNA) profiling that integrates automated exRNA extraction, small RNA sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis including data processing and normalization. Automated extraction protocols, including doubling input volume or lyophilization to increase RNA yield, were benchmarked against leading manual methods, with donor pregnancy status serving as the primary biological variable. Small RNA sequencing was performed across conditions, enabling systematic evaluation of data quality and comparison of normalization strategies. Across methods and biofluids, DESeq2 most effectively reduced technical variability while preserving biological signal. Comparing specimen types, plasma exhibited the highest reproducibility and retention of biological signal, followed by serum, while urine exhibited greater variability and less differentially expressed miRNAs. Pregnancy-associated ex-miRNA signatures, including C19MC miRNAs, were consistently detected in both plasma and serum. Together, this study establishes a robust framework for scalable exRNA extraction and profiling, supporting standardized assay development for biomarker discovery and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.