Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42320479›Full record

ReviewCell reports methods2026

Spatial omics illuminates tumor heterogeneity.

Neha Srinivas, Serap Erdogmus, Gurkan Mollaoglu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neha SrinivasDepartment of Microbiology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Serap ErdogmusDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Gurkan MollaogluDepartment of Microbiology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Immunology Institute, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: gmollaog@uab.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is the coexistence of diverse cancer cell states, genotypes, and microenvironmental niches within a single tumor and is a major driver of therapeutic resistance and disease progression. While the clinical implications of ITH are well appreciated, conventional methods and models have been limited in resolving the spatial and functional complexity underlying ITH. Recent advances in single-cell and spatial omics, high-plex imaging, and in vivo CRISPR perturbation and lineage tracing now enable unprecedented, mechanistic dissection of tumor ecosystems. These technologies are beginning to reveal how cell-cell interactions, spatial organization, and clonal evolution collectively shape tumor behavior and treatment response. We review emerging methods for spatial proteomics and transcriptomics, functional genomics, and clonal tracing and highlight how their integration is redefining the study of ITH. We also discuss current challenges, including scalability, accessibility, and multimodal data integration, and opportunities as cancer biology enters the spatial era.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityGenomicsNeoplasmsProteomicsAnimalsHumansMultiomicsSpatial TranscriptomicsTumor MicroenvironmentCP: cancer biologyCP: systems biology

Identifiers

PMID42320479
PMCPMC13494549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.