Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42320393›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026

Neural correlates of learning speed reveal developmental differences in memory.

Tess Allegra Forest, Margaret L Schlichting, Amy S Finn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tess Allegra ForestColumbia University, Department of Psychology, United States; University of Toronto, Department of Psychology, Canada. Electronic address: taf2134@columbia.edu.
Margaret L SchlichtingUniversity of Toronto, Department of Psychology, Canada.
Amy S FinnUniversity of Toronto, Department of Psychology, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A great deal of research has tried to understand the nature of children's memory representations across time-especially in regard to how young learners navigate the conflicting pressures of remembering specific details of their experiences versus learning about more general aspects of their worlds. Here, we conducted a preregistered, exploratory analysis of developmental fMRI data to ask how learning speed impacts memory formation, and probe the idea that developmental differences in the balance of specific and general memory might be partially explained by the rate at which children (N = 35, ages 9-10) and adults (N = 35) learn. Using a statistical learning task and a novel application of decoding with MVPA, we quantified whether each learner's brain detected the presence of structured information early or late in learning. Adults who showed early neural sensitivity to structure formed only general memories while those who detected structure later formed both specific and general memories. In children, however, we observed a trade-off: children who showed early neural sensitivity to structure formed only specific memories while those who detected structure later formed only general memories. These data have important implications for theories of learning and memory development in many contexts.

Indexed as

BrainChild DevelopmentLearningMemoryAdultBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultClassificationLearning RateMemory DevelopmentNeural DevelopmentStatistical LearningTiming

Identifiers

PMID42320393
PMCPMC13314806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.