ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Treatment for Hyperosmolar Dehydration in Hospitalised Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Gaps.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dehydration-specifically hyperosmolar dehydration (HD)-in adults is a common clinical condition affecting an estimated 25%-58% of adults admitted to the hospital, depending on the method used to assess HD and the patient group. HD is defined as low total body water and increased serum osmolality over 300 mOsm/kg. Hypernatremia, increased blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio, and calculated serum osmolarity are often used as proxy markers. The condition is associated with an increased risk of a range of complications, including increased morbidity and mortality. Despite the high prevalence, current treatment guidelines often fail to distinguish HD from hypovolemia. As a result, HD is often treated like hypovolemia with fluids containing isotonic saline rather than hypotonic fluids. Objective: The objective of this review is to identify and summarize existing studies on the treatment of HD in adults and to map the current evidence, highlight gaps in the literature and guide future research. Methods: The planned review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with additional examination of reference lists and citations (backward snowballing) and a search for completed trials based on found protocols (forward snowballing). Original studies of any design focusing on adult patients with a suspected low total body water and biochemically-confirmed HD receiving treatment for HD will be included. Studies will be excluded if: conducted on a non-adult population, no diagnoses of HD, focusing solely on hypovolaemia, or conducted in a non-hospital setting. Data charting will contain study characteristics, participant demographics, details of HD diagnosis, treatment approaches, and reported outcomes. Relevant information from the included studies will be reported in a narrative summary, supported by descriptive analyses of quantitative data where appropriate. Results: The primary search was completed in September 2025. An updated search will be performed before the completion of the review. As of April 2026, data extraction using Covidence on the relevant studies found in the primary search has been completed. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide an overview of the current evidence on the treatment of HD in patients referred to hospital, identifying key insights and evidence gaps to inform future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.