Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319945›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Dynamic population coding of kinematic structure across executed and observed actions in primate premotor cortex.

Konstantinos Chatzimichail, Christos Paschalidis, Eleftheria Tzamali, Vassilis Papadourakis, Vassilis Raos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konstantinos ChatzimichailLab of Movement Physiology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0009-0006-6227-4965
Christos PaschalidisLab of Movement Physiology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Eleftheria TzamaliLab of Movement Physiology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1756-7762
Vassilis PapadourakisLab of Movement Physiology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-0963
Vassilis RaosLab of Movement Physiology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-8901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons active during both action execution and observation [mirror neurons (MirNs)] are central to theories of action understanding, yet what they represent remains debated: abstract goals, static grips, or movement kinematics? We recorded 433 neurons from macaque premotor cortex during execution and observation of reach-to-grasp actions. Population analyses revealed grasp-specific information in both conditions, broadly distributed across neurons and dynamically reconfigured over time. Generalization across task phases was limited, indicating time-specific and evolving population codes rather than static representations. Execution and observation were linked by a shared, partially overlapping population geometry that supported reliable cross-condition classification, with the strongest alignment emerging during movement and hold. Neural activity was systematically related to multidimensional hand kinematics, and these relationships generalized across neuronal populations and across agents. Together, these findings support a dynamic population-level account of MirN function in which premotor circuits integrate visual and motor signals to represent and anticipate the unfolding structure of others' actions.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHand StrengthMacaca mulattaMaleMovementNeurons

Identifiers

PMID42319945
PMCPMC13281793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.