ReviewJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Community-Led Transformation in Practice: A Framework for Trust-Driven Community-Academic Partnerships to Advance Public Health.
Review in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-academic partnerships are increasingly recognized as essential for advancing equitable public health outcomes. Yet many partnerships struggle to move beyond short-term, project-based collaboration toward sustained, trust-based engagement with communities. This commentary draws on the experience of the University of California San Diego Center for Community Health (CCH) and its long-standing partnerships with immigrant, refugee, and other underserved communities in San Diego County. Over more than two decades of practice, CCH and its community partners developed the Community-Led Transformation (CLT) approach to guide authentic community-academic collaboration. We describe three interdependent pillars of CLT: valuing community expertise, fostering trust-based partnerships, and ensuring fair access to resources and power-sharing. Examples from CCH programs, coalitions, and research collaborations illustrate how these principles are operationalized in practice. We also reflect on structural challenges within academic institutions, including funding instability, administrative barriers, and limitations in partnership infrastructure, and strategies used to navigate these constraints while sustaining community partnerships. We provide specific recommendations for academic partners, community partners, and funders to facilitate community-academic partnerships via increased capacity building, infrastructural supports, and greater relationship and trust building. The CLT framework has therefore been a success within CCH, and can provide practical insights for a variety of partners and institutions seeking to build authentic, durable partnerships that meaningfully advance public health and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.