ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
The development and mixed-method stakeholder evaluation of a sport-related concussion symptom and treatment monitoring system in community rugby.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSport-related concussion injuries are common in community Rugby Union. Despite research advancements in SRC management in recent years, little is known about the translation of research to practice within community Rugby Union cohorts.
aimsTo develop and evaluate a novel system to track comprehensive SRC history, symptoms, and treatment data within community Rugby Union players.
methodsThe Three-Phase Rugby Concussion System (TPRCS) collected comprehensive SRC data from players throughout the 2024-25 community Rugby Union season at baseline, 0-5 days post-SRC, and 0-5 days post-unrestricted return to play. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for stakeholders (players and club medics, n = 10) involved post-season, to evaluate participation experience, alongside perceived research facilitators, barriers, and usefulness.
resultsSurvey compliance ranged from 51% at baseline (n = 135), to 74% for post-SRC (n = 23), and post-clearance surveys (n = 23). The evaluation surveys received positive feedback for TPRCS's ease of use and communication pathways, with player enthusiasm levels for study participation being the lowest-scoring survey response. The main facilitators for TPRCS included club culture, incentives, and personal contact, whilst the main barriers were absence of injury reporting and lack of prioritisation from players. Stakeholders identified education, injury treatment, and policy change as potential areas of usefulness.
conclusionsMedics and players in community Rugby Union are enthusiastic to progress practice and behaviours in line with research. Overall, this stakeholder-evaluated comprehensive SRC data collection system can serve as a novel SRC research framework across Rugby Unions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.