ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Calibration of diffusion MRI measurements using aqueous glycerin phantoms with controlled viscosity.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To characterize the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic viscosity in aqueous glycerin phantoms across different concentrations and temperatures, and to establish a controlled calibration framework for diffusion MRI measurements. Eight glycerin-water solutions (10-60 wt%) were prepared, and viscosities were measured with capillary viscometers at 24, 37, and 40 °C. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed on a 3.0-T scanner using 15 b-values (0-1500 s/mm²). Voxel-wise ADC maps were calculated by mono-exponential fitting, and ADC-viscosity relationships were modeled using linear and inverse fitting approaches. Viscosity increased with concentration and decreased with temperature, consistent with the known physical behavior of glycerin-water mixtures. ADC values were inversely related to viscosity and showed strong relationships at all temperatures (R² > 0.98). High-concentration samples exhibited reduced signal-to-noise ratio and greater fitting instability, limiting reliable analysis in the highest-viscosity range. Aqueous glycerin solutions provide practical phantom materials for evaluating ADC-viscosity relationships under controlled conditions. By anchoring MRI-derived ADC measurements to standard viscometer data, this study established a reproducible calibration framework for diffusion MRI system evaluation across a defined viscosity range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.