ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Establishing discard criteria for lead aprons using deep learning-based quantification of defect area on X-ray fluoroscopic video.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To establish an objective discard framework for lead aprons, defect areas quantified from X-ray fluoroscopy videos were linked to their corresponding dosimetric impacts. A fine-tuned YOLOv8 instance segmentation model, achieving an average precision at an intersection-over-union threshold of 0.5 (AP@0.5) of 0.457, was employed to analyze fluoroscopic videos of 18 aprons with 0.25 mmPb equivalence. The model enabled automated defect detection and area estimation with a video processing time of 15 s. Dosimetry experiments mimicking endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) conditions were conducted using an anthropomorphic phantom and apron samples with slit defects of varying widths. The results indicated that the transmitted dose increased linearly with defect area under all tested conditions. Based on weighted least-squares analysis of covariance (WLS-ANCOVA), slit widths of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.5 mm were pooled for modeling, as they exhibited similar dosimetric behavior. A linear model was applied to relate defect area to the increase in transmitted dose, defining the discard threshold as the minimum area at which the upper one-sided 95% prediction limit reached a specified dose limit. Given a baseline dose of 2.38 mSv after transmission through the apron without defects and a regulatory dose limit of 5 mSv per 3 months, the discard threshold for slit-like defects was determined to be 2.87 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.