Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319659›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2026

Brighter nights, greater health risks: intensity-dependent disruptions by nighttime light exposure on sleep and metabolism in diurnal zebra finches.

Mayank Kumar, Nidhi Yadav, Vatsala Tripathi, Sanjay Kumar Bhardwaj

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mayank KumarDepartment of Zoology, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, 250004, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9878-0169
Nidhi YadavDepartment of Zoology, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, 250004, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0774-1529
Vatsala TripathiDepartment of Zoology, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, 250004, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-5035
Sanjay Kumar BhardwajDepartment of Zoology, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, 250004, India. drskumar7@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3847-2607

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi SERB Grant no [CRG/2019/000321]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that dark nights are crucial for the maintenance of both body and brain health. Given unavoidable exposure to lighted night environment at the present time of increasing usage of light at night, it is critical to identify the nocturnal illumination that would still be less harmful. The present study addressed this, by examining daily activity-rest and nocturnal sleep patterns, and metabolic effects in diurnal zebra finches exposed to an equinox photoperiod (12:12 light: dark cycle) containing an identical light intensity during day (L = ~ 150 lux) and no light (0 lux) or three increasing dim light illuminations at 2-, 5- or 8-lux light intensities (n = 7 per condition). Illuminated nights caused disruptions in diurnal activity and feeding patterns, nocturnal sleep, and metabolism. In particular, birds under lighted nights showed an increased night activity and eating bouts, without a significant change in the 24-h activity and food intake, and fragmented sleep with frequent and smaller bouts. At the end of 3 weeks, birds were fatter and gained body mass under lighted night than those in dark night. We also found increased blood glucose levels and reduced oxalate, but not corticosterone, and concurrent effects on the expression of genes associated with glucose and lipid metabolism. Most importantly, however, the severity of deleterious effects paralleled the increasing nocturnal illumination, i.e., effects under 2 lux < 5 lux < 8 lux light intensity at night, compared to the dark night (0 lux). These results argue for the usage of reduced light intensity in situations where night light is unavoidable to minimize the health risks to animals, and perhaps humans in an urbanized environment.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmFinchesLightSleepAnimalsMalePhotoperiodActivityFeedingLight at nightMetabolismSleepZebra finches

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.