SynthesisJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Measurement properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale in community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older: a COSMIN systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo systematically review and grade the measurement properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale in community-dwelling older adults using the COSMIN framework.
methodsFive electronic databases were searched through July 2025 from inception. Eligible studies included adults aged 50 years or older and examined the ABC scale in any version or translation. Methodological quality was evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, and the certainty of the evidence was graded with the COSMIN-adapted GRADE approach. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251178952).
resultsA total of 22 studies were included, covering the ABC-16 (n = 16), ABC-6 (n = 5), and ABC-S (n = 1) in 11 languages. Internal consistency (α = 0.86-0.99) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82-0.99) were consistently sufficient with moderate certainty. Structural and construct validity were generally supported. In contrast, content validity was primarily assessed during cross-cultural adaptations, measurement error was seldom assessed, and cross-cultural validity and responsiveness were rarely tested. The Arabic ABC-16 showed the strongest overall evidence and was categorized as ready for use (Category A). Versions in Chinese-Canadian, Cantonese, Mandarin ABC-6, Brazilian Portuguese, Persian, German, Urdu, Sepedi, Chinese, English (Canadian), and Hindi demonstrated promising properties but require local validation (Category B). Dutch and Mandarin ABC-16 versions as well as the earlier Portuguese version did not meet current COSMIN standards and require re-validation (Category C).
conclusionThe ABC scale generally demonstrates strong reliability and validity of balance confidence in older adults. The ABC-16 remains the most comprehensive version, while the ABC-6 provides an efficient screening tool. Category A versions can be considered for use in clinical and research settings. Future work should focus on responsiveness, cross-cultural invariance, and interpretability to strengthen clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.