ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic management of complex ileal conduit complications.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ileal conduit urinary diversion is associated with complications involving the uretero-ileal anastomosis, conduit segment, stoma, and abdominal wall. Complex complications may require individualized reconstructive strategies based on the specific anatomic failure mechanism. A video-based descriptive technical analysis was performed using a narrated operative recording of four robot-assisted reconstructive procedures for ileal conduit complications: right uretero-ileal stricture, bilateral uretero-ileal stricture, delayed conduit torsion with parastomal hernia, and crossed ureters after ileal conduit diversion. The unilateral stricture repair used antegrade methylene blue injection, needle confirmation of the ureteral lumen, ureteral incision and spatulation, ileal conduit incision, stenting, and running side-to-side uretero-ileal reimplantation. The bilateral stricture repair required mobilization and removal of the prior conduit, creation of a longer ileal conduit, bowel reconstruction, ICG-assisted ureteral identification, bilateral ureteral spatulation, stenting, and running uretero-ileal reimplantation. The torsion case involved circumferential stomal access, fascial opening, detorsion of a 360-degree conduit twist, and parastomal reinforcement with polypropylene mesh. The crossed-ureter revision used bilateral excision of prior anastomoses to healthy tissue, side-specific dye/saline confirmation, bilateral spatulation, double-barrel ureteral reconstruction, and circumferential anastomosis to the conduit. Complex ileal conduit revision can be organized around problem recognition, ureteral identity confirmation, preparation of healthy tissue, tension-aware reconstruction, and repair selection based on the underlying anatomic defect. This mechanism-based approach provides a structured framework for robot-assisted correction of uretero-ileal strictures, conduit torsion, and ureteral malorientation after ileal conduit diversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.