Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319610›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Deep learning-based CT slice synthesis improves radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance in lung nodule assessment.

Hujun Yang, Zhengping Zhang, Lei Tian, Pei Dang, Long Wan, Zhiyuan Zhou, Jingjie Li, Lei Cao, Xiaoyan Yang, Juan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hujun Yang *Department of Computer Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Zhengping Zhang *Department of Radiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Lei TianNingxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Pei DangDepartment of Radiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Long WanDepartment of Computer Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Zhiyuan ZhouDepartment of Computer Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Jingjie LiDepartment of Computer Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Lei CaoDepartment of Computer Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Xiaoyan YangDepartment of Key Laboratory of Ningxia Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China. yxy18161659153@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-1915
Juan ChenDepartment of Key Laboratory of Ningxia Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China. chenjuan7419@163.com.

Funding

Central Government Guiding Local Special Project for Science and Technology Development 2024FRD05046Key Research and Development Project of Ningxia No.2023BEG02021,No.2025BEG02002Key Research and Development Project of Ningxia No.2024BEH04028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effect of CT slice thickness on radiomic features (RFs) in terms of reproducibility and discriminative power, and to assess whether a deep learning-based CT slice synthesis (DLS) algorithm can mitigate the adverse effects associated with thick-slice CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 506 patients with lung nodules (245 benign, 261 malignant) from two independent cohorts, which were divided into a training set, internal validation set (IVS), and external validation set (EVS). Chest CT reconstructed at 1-mm and 5-mm slice thicknesses was analyzed. A DLS algorithm was applied to convert 5-mm CT into synthetic 1-mm CT. RFs were extracted from all CT types to construct radiomics models. Reproducibility was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Discriminative power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with DeLong's test.

resultsThe CCCs of DLS 1-mm CT were 0.48 ± 0.37 and 0.49 ± 0.37 in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively, significantly higher than real 5-mm CT (all p < 0.001). Most RFs from 5-mm CT lacked reproducibility (CCC ≥ 0.85; 0.9% in both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), whereas DLS 1-mm CT showed marked improvement (Cohort 1, 27.6%; Cohort 2, 26.9%). The discriminative power of RFs from DLS 1-mm CT was superior to that of 5-mm CT and non-inferior to real 1-mm CT, both in model construction and evaluation.

conclusionCT slice thickness substantially influences the reproducibility and discriminative power of RFs, whereas the DLS algorithm effectively mitigates the limitations associated with thick-slice CT. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning-based CT slice synthesis significantly reduces the slice thickness-related variability in radiomics feature reproducibility and discriminative power, providing a promising methodological approach to improve radiomics standardization and support its clinical translation. KEY POINTS: CT slice thickness variability substantially impairs radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance, posing a major barrier to standardized radiomics analysis. Across two independent cohorts, deep learning-based slice synthesis mitigated the adverse effects of thick-slice CT on radiomic feature reproducibility and cross-thickness discriminative performance.

Indexed as

Deep learningImage processing, computer-assistedRadiomicsTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID42319610
PMCPMC13282418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.