Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319606›Full record

SynthesisPurinergic signalling2026

Selective P2X3 versus dual P2X2/3 receptor antagonists in refractory chronic cough: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jeevarathinam Thirumalai, Indra Sivakumar, Saravanan Sekaran

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Purinergic signalling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeevarathinam ThirumalaiDepartment of Research, Saveetha College of Nursing, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, 602105, Chennai, India. jeevarathinamhope@gmail.com.
Indra SivakumarSaveetha Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, 602105, Chennai, India.
Saravanan SekaranSaveetha Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, 602105, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-mediated purinergic signalling via P2X3 and heteromeric P2X2/3 ion channel receptors underlies hypersensitisation of vagal airway afferents in refractory chronic cough (RCC), making this pathway a key therapeutic target. Two pharmacological strategies have emerged: dual P2X2/3 receptor antagonism and selective P2X3 inhibition. While dual antagonists (gefapixant) demonstrate robust antitussive efficacy, their clinical use is limited by taste disturbance resulting from P2X2/3 inhibition in gustatory pathways. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating purinergic receptor antagonists in RCC, with nine RCTs (21 active arms; N = 1,934) identified from major databases. The primary outcome was percentage change in 24-h cough frequency (24-h CF) versus placebo. Dual P2X2/3 antagonists produced greater reductions in 24-h CF than selective P2X3 antagonists (- 38.12% vs - 19.93%; p = 0.016), consistent with broader receptor blockade. However, selective P2X3 antagonists demonstrated a markedly improved safety profile, with substantially lower dysgeusia incidence (8% vs 51%; p < 0.0001), reflecting sparing of P2X2/3-mediated gustatory signalling. Dose-response analysis indicated steeper efficacy gains with dual antagonists but disproportionately higher taste-related adverse effects. Among selective agents, camlipixant (≥ 50 mg BID) achieved clinically meaningful cough reduction (- 34%) with minimal dysgeusia (5-7%). These findings demonstrate a mechanistically defined benefit-risk trade-off in purinergic receptor targeting, supporting selective P2X3 antagonism as a more favourable strategy for modulating ATP-driven airway sensory signalling in RCC while preserving tolerability.

Indexed as

Antitussive AgentsChronic CoughPurinergic P2X Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2X2Receptors, Purinergic P2X3Dose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntitussive AgentsPurinergic P2X Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2X2Receptors, Purinergic P2X3CamlipixantChronic respiratory diseaseEliapixantGefapixantP2X2/3 receptorP2X3 receptorPublic HealthPurinergic signallingRefractory chronic coughSivopixant

Identifiers

PMID42319606
PMCPMC13282434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.