SynthesisPurinergic signalling2026
Selective P2X3 versus dual P2X2/3 receptor antagonists in refractory chronic cough: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Purinergic signalling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-mediated purinergic signalling via P2X3 and heteromeric P2X2/3 ion channel receptors underlies hypersensitisation of vagal airway afferents in refractory chronic cough (RCC), making this pathway a key therapeutic target. Two pharmacological strategies have emerged: dual P2X2/3 receptor antagonism and selective P2X3 inhibition. While dual antagonists (gefapixant) demonstrate robust antitussive efficacy, their clinical use is limited by taste disturbance resulting from P2X2/3 inhibition in gustatory pathways. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating purinergic receptor antagonists in RCC, with nine RCTs (21 active arms; N = 1,934) identified from major databases. The primary outcome was percentage change in 24-h cough frequency (24-h CF) versus placebo. Dual P2X2/3 antagonists produced greater reductions in 24-h CF than selective P2X3 antagonists (- 38.12% vs - 19.93%; p = 0.016), consistent with broader receptor blockade. However, selective P2X3 antagonists demonstrated a markedly improved safety profile, with substantially lower dysgeusia incidence (8% vs 51%; p < 0.0001), reflecting sparing of P2X2/3-mediated gustatory signalling. Dose-response analysis indicated steeper efficacy gains with dual antagonists but disproportionately higher taste-related adverse effects. Among selective agents, camlipixant (≥ 50 mg BID) achieved clinically meaningful cough reduction (- 34%) with minimal dysgeusia (5-7%). These findings demonstrate a mechanistically defined benefit-risk trade-off in purinergic receptor targeting, supporting selective P2X3 antagonism as a more favourable strategy for modulating ATP-driven airway sensory signalling in RCC while preserving tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.