ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Internet promotion of robotically assisted arthroplasty by members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: are we telling the whole story?
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An accrued interest has recently developed in robotics in total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). This study addressed the questions, "What is the degree of promotion of robotics in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) on the internet by members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS), and what information is conveyed?" An internet search was conducted to identify orthopaedic surgeon-promotional websites for each member of the AAHKS using the members' full name and a previously published set of criteria. Each site was systematically assessed utilizing a questionnaire to identify claims made regarding proposed robotic-assisted TJA risks and benefits. We identified 4683 qualified websites. Robotic use was referenced in 35.5% (1664) of these websites. Claims regarding robotic-assisted TJA-specific benefits included improved implant positioning (31.7%), faster recovery (20.0%), and increased precision (18.5%). Potential robotic-assisted TJA-specific risks including lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (THA) / saphenous nerve (TKA) injuries, iatrogenic fracture, and infection were addressed on only 5.8%, 5.6%, and 3.6% of websites, respectively. More than one third of AAHKS members discussed robotic use in TJA on the internet. Websites referenced robotic-assisted TJA benefits more frequently than potential risks. While there are no regulations set forth by the AAHKS regarding marketing validity, there is an opportunity for professional societies and orthopaedic surgeons to advocate for more balanced online communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.