Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319514›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2026

Multi-Year Biofilm Formation on Granitic Surfaces Reveals Dynamic Microbial Communities in Fennoscandian Shield Deep Groundwaters.

Magnus Ståhle, Anders Johnson, Stephanie Turner, Per Mårtensson, Birgitta Kalinowski, Mark Dopson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magnus StåhleCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. magnus.stahle@lnu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1307-6181
Anders JohnsonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2943-5158
Stephanie TurnerCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1915-0139
Per MårtenssonSwedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0538-4234
Birgitta KalinowskiSwedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-6081
Mark DopsonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-3318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep terrestrial biosphere is the vast biome beneath the soil layer that contains the majority of the Earth's prokaryotic biomass, yet it is one of the least investigated communities. Although, estimates of deep biosphere biomass suggest biofilm cells outnumber the planktonic biomass by several orders of magnitude, most investigations target planktonic communities captured from groundwaters. This multi-year study used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to compare planktonic and biofilm communities attached to natural granitic rock, demonstrating that biofilm formation selected for taxa with distinct relative abundances and exhibited temporal development. The biofilm communities also showed a decreasing influence of introduced populations on the natural rock surfaces (macadam) present at the onset of the incubations. After two- and four-years of biofilm incubation, a community developed that was dominated by sulfur/sulfate reducing Desulfocapsaceae, Desulfobacteraceae, and BM004 along with the families UBA5619, Rhodocyclaceae, Profunditerraquicolaceae, and UBA2206. This long-term community included populations predicted to be host-associated ultra-small cells. This contrasted with previous studies of early biofilm development in deep Fennoscandian Shield groundwaters that suggested biofilm initiation was mediated by lithotrophic carbon and nitrogen fixing populations. However, metabolic predictions based upon the 16S rRNA gene-based communities also showed an autotrophic and diazotrophic community including sulfur cycling in line with the previous studies. In conclusion, this study showed long-term biofilm composition to be dissimilar to the planktonic communities with a consistent strategy for energy conservation similar to previous studies of early biofilm formation from these groundwaters.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsGroundwaterMicrobiotaSilicon DioxidePhylogenyPlanktonRNA, Ribosomal, 16SgraniteRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSilicon Dioxide16S rRNA geneÄspö hard rock laboratoryCarbon fixationNitrogen fixationSulfur cycling

Identifiers

PMID42319514
PMCPMC13283197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.