Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319506›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2026

β2-microglobulin is superior to lactate dehydrogenase and bulky disease for risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with IPI 1-2.

Hung Chang, Yu-Shin Hung, Ming-Chung Kuo, Tung-Liang Lin, Hsiao-Wen Kao, Hsuan-Jen Shih, Yi-Jiun Su, Yuen-Chin Ong, Ning-Chun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hung ChangSchool of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. horng@adm.cgmh.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-0304
Yu-Shin HungSchool of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ming-Chung KuoSchool of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tung-Liang LinDivision of Hematology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Wen KaoSchool of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsuan-Jen ShihDivision of Hematology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Yi-Jiun SuDivision of Hematology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Yuen-Chin OngDivision of Hematology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Ning-Chun ChenDivision of Hematology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou CORPG3G0821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the classical assessment tool to evaluate prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although the IPI is simple, reproducible, well validated and widely utilized, it is not entirely accurate in some patients with DLBCL. Recently, it was reported that a subgroup of high-risk DLBCL patients with IPI score 1 or 2 can be identified by bulky disease and high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Such classification of high-risk DLBCL has been used in new clinical trials. We analyzed out cohort database to validate such a sub-classification and further evaluated subdivision by serum β2-microglobulin levels. We retrieved the list of patients with new diagnosis of DLBCL between 2015 and 2019 from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou. Consecutive cases were enrolled without a pre-set sample size assessment. For each patient, the IPI was calculated according to published literature. Patients with an IPI score of 1 and 2 were included for this analysis. High-risk DLBCL was defined as bulky tumors (> 7 cm) or high LDH levels (> 1.3-fold upper limit). Serum β2-microglobulin levels were measured in the clinical laboratory. Analyses were done by comparing patients with or without high-risk features as well as patients with or without high β2-microglobulin levels (≥ 3000 µg/L). In 523 patients with DLBCL, 238 had an IPI score of 1-2, and 234 (115 male and 119 female) had sufficient data for high-risk DLBCL sub-classification. The median age was 64 years (range 26 to 90 years). Blood level of β2-microglobulin correlated with that of LDH (r2 = 0.03, p = 0.0136). There was no difference in β2-microglobulin levels between patients with and without bulky tumors (p = 0.3573). Using LDH > 1.3-fold upper limit as the cutoff, patients with high LDH had significantly higher levels of β2-microglobulin (p = 0.0096). Sixty-seven patients had high-risk features, defined by high LDH or bulky disease. These patients have significantly higher β2-microglobulin levels (p = 0.0173). However, in clinical outcome, high-risk and low-risk DLBCL do not differ significantly in progression-free survival (p = 0.8794) or overall survival (p = 0.4464). Using 3000 µg/L as a cutoff, patients with high β2-microglobulin levels had significantly shorter progression-free survival (p = 0.0183) than those with low levels. The difference in overall survival between high and low-level β2-microglobulin did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.2044). Our experience suggests the high-risk sub-classification based on LDH and bulky disease among patients with an IPI score of 1 or 2 does not correlate with clinical outcomes. In contrast, high levels of β2-microglobulin may help identify a sub-group of high-risk patients. This biomarker may be helpful in refining treatment plans or designing future clinical trials.

Indexed as

beta 2-MicroglobulinBiomarkers, TumorL-Lactate DehydrogenaseLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentB2M protein, humanbeta 2-MicroglobulinBiomarkers, TumorL-Lactate DehydrogenaseBulky diseaseDLBCLInternational prognostic indexLDHβ2-microglobulin

Identifiers

PMID42319506
PMCPMC13522024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.