ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Selective intraoperative cholangiography: A retrospective single-centre analysis compared with national data and implications for surgical training.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can assist in visualising the biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, particularly in cases with unclear anatomical conditions, and may thereby help to prevent complications such as bile duct injury. Despite its potential relevance, the method is infrequently used in many hospitals and is often not included in surgical training curricula. The aim of this study was to quantify the selective, on-demand use of IOC in a specialised visceral surgery centre, compare local data with national statistics, and interpret the findings in the context of international recommendations on surgical safety and education. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, all cholecystectomies performed at a visceral surgery centre between July 2015 and June 2023 were evaluated regarding the use and indications for IOC. In addition, national data from the Federal Statistical Office (2015-2021) were analysed to assess nationwide trends. The results were further interpreted in light of international literature and Delphi consensus statements on safe cholecystectomy.
resultsOf a total of 1,313 cholecystectomies, IOC was performed in 34 cases (2.6%), mainly to clarify biliary anatomy. The conversion rate in the centre was 1.4%, and the incidence of major bile duct injuries (≥ Neuhaus type B[1]) was 0.07%. On the national level, the utilisation of IOC showed a decreasing trend over the observation period.
conclusionOn-demand intraoperative cholangiography is a safe and well-established technique that can facilitate anatomical orientation in selected difficult cases. The present single-centre data suggest that it can be integrated into clinical practice as an intraoperative problem-solving tool. Despite clear international recommendations and high appraisal in methodological consensus processes, its use remains limited in clinical practice and insufficiently represented in surgical training. Given the continued relevance of bile duct injuries, systematic integration of selective IOC into surgical education programmes appears warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.