ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Nomogram prediction model for pain recurrence in patients with trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the first-line surgical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, some patients experience recurrence despite achieving immediate pain relief after MVD. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for TN recurrence and to develop a predictive nomogram model. We enrolled patients with TN who achieved immediate pain relief after MVD with at least 2 years of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors of long-term pain recurrence, based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, a nomogram model for predicting pain recurrence was developed. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the prediction efficiency of the nomogram model, and calibration curve was used to analyze the accuracy of the nomogram model. Eventually, 264 patients were included in this study, during a mean follow-up of 43.06 ± 16.99 months, 23 patients experienced pain recurrence. Regression analysis suggested that younger age, longer pain duration, and atypical pain were the independent risk factors for long-term pain recurrence. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discriminatory power, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958. The calibration curve analysis indicated good agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities. Favorable long-term outcomes could be achieved in TN patients with immediate pain relief after MVD, patients with younger age, longer pain duration and atypical pain may be at higher risk for pain recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.