ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Repurposing approved drugs as ferroptosis modulators: a critical review of clinical trials in cancer and neurodegeneration.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ferroptosis-Based Nanotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Through Glutathione Depletion and Iron Accumulation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ferroptosis is a regulated form of cell death that depends on iron and is marked by lipid peroxidation and the inactivation of glutathione peroxidase 4. It has emerged as a pathway of broad relevance to cancer and neurodegenerative disease. Preclinical studies have identified potent ferroptosis inducers (System Xc⁻ and GPX4 inhibitors) and inhibitors (liproxstatin/ferrostatin derivatives, FSP1-CoQ10 activators) with promising therapeutic potential. However, clinical translation remains limited. Since dedicated therapeutics targeting ferroptosis are still in early development, current clinical evidence mainly comes from drug repurposing, approved drugs whose ferroptosis-modulating properties were discovered retrospectively after their initial approval. None of these completed trials used ferroptosis-specific pharmacodynamic data or prospectively tested ferroptosis as the primary therapeutic mechanism. Instead of just reclassifying these trials, this review introduces a four-category failure-mode framework, mechanism mismatch, biomarker absence, model-to-trial prediction, and target non-selective compound, to explain why preclinical signals of ferroptosis have yet to translate successfully. We conclude that progress depends on three developments: targeted modulators (purpose-developed or repurposed with confirmed engagement), proof-of-mechanism trials using ferroptosis-related endpoints, and patient selection aligned with precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.