Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319409›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Assessing the performance of deep learning and hand-crafted radiomics models using MRI and ultrasound in predicting axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Iman Kiani, Niloufar Pourakbar, Amir Mohammad Azizpour, Tanya Mousavi, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Farzad Pourghazi, Amirali Khosravi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iman KianiStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Niloufar PourakbarStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Mohammad AzizpourStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tanya MousaviStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed MohammadzadehStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad PourghaziCenter for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirali KhosraviDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. khosravi.amirali@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-2987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) is a critical prognostic factor in breast cancer. While sentinel lymph node biopsy remains the gold standard, conventional imaging relies on operator expertise with variable diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL) and hand-crafted radiomics (HCR) models using MRI and ultrasound (US) for ALNM prediction.

methodsLiterature search was conducted across four databases up to November 2024. Studies assessing DL or HCR models for ALNM prediction using MRI or US, with histopathological confirmation as the reference standard, were included. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were pooled using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I², and subgroup analyses explored its potential sources.

resultsAcross 41 included studies, pooled sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84) and specificity 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75-0.81) for internal validation, with AUC 0.84. External validation demonstrated sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.74, with an AUC of 0.82. Likelihood ratio analysis (LR+ 3.0, LR- 0.33) indicated limited standalone clinical utility. Ensemble approaches combining DL and HCR showed higher diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.88 in MRI and AUC = 0.92 in US) compared to individual methods. Models incorporating both intratumoral and peritumoral regions yielded higher AUCs (0.81 vs 0.75) than intratumoral alone.

conclusionAI models demonstrate moderate diagnostic accuracy but limited standalone clinical utility. These tools may serve adjunctive roles in risk stratification and treatment planning. Ensemble approaches combining DL and HCR achieve superior performance. Methodological standardization and validation across diverse populations are essential before clinical implementation. KEY POINTS: Question Can artificial intelligence models applied to US and MRI accurately predict axillary lymph-node metastasis in breast cancer? Findings Across 41 studies, AI models demonstrated good diagnostic performance for predicting nodal metastasis. DL, HCR, and combined approaches each achieved clinically meaningful accuracy, with integrated DL + HCR models showing the highest pooled diagnostic effect and lowest heterogeneity. Clinical relevance AI-enhanced imaging can assist in non-invasively stratifying nodal status and may reduce reliance on invasive procedures such as sentinel lymph-node biopsy. Consistent imaging protocols, standardized model development, and external validation are needed before clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Axillary lymph nodesBreast cancerDeep learningHand-crafted radiomicsMRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.