Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319399›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026

Effect of ammonia-free silver fluoride and silver diammine fluoride on immediate microshear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer to demineralised primary tooth dentine.

A Abedinzade Zare, M Vafadar, M Behroozibakhsh, A Hashemian, M Lari, S Abtahi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Abedinzade ZareDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of.
M VafadarDepartment of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of.
M BehroozibakhshDepartment of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of.
A HashemianDepartment of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of.
M LariSchool of Computing, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
S AbtahiDepartment of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of. Sara.abtahi@hdr.mq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-797X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the effect of water-based ammonia-free silver fluoride (SF) and silver diammine fluoride (SDF) on the microshear bond strength (MSBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) to artificially demineralised primary tooth dentine.

methodsTwenty-four extracted primary molars were prepared to expose mid-coronal dentine; two bonding sites per tooth (total = 48 specimens) were chemically demineralised (pH 4.8) to simulate active caries. Specimens were randomised into three groups (n = 16): SF (Riva Star Aqua), SDF (Cariestop 30%), and Control (distilled water). RMGIC (Riva Light Cure HV) was bonded and stored for 24 h at 37 °C. MSBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were analysed using a stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA with Tamhane's T2 post hoc test (α = 0.05).

resultsThe SF group exhibited significantly lower bond strength (3.65 ± 1.80 MPa) than the Control (6.86 ± 3.15 MPa, p < 0.01) and SDF groups (6.65 ± 4.80 MPa, p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between SDF and Control (p > 0.05); however, the SDF group demonstrated greater variability, consistent with Weibull analysis. Adhesive failure predominated across all groups, with SDF showing more mixed failures.

conclusionWater-based SF significantly compromised RMGIC adhesion to demineralised primary tooth dentine. SDF maintained comparable mean bond strength to the control but with higher variability. Ammonia-free SF formulations may reduce immediate RMGIC retention when used before restoration, and this interaction may warrant protocol optimisation in SMART-based applications.

Indexed as

Cariostatic AgentsDental BondingDentinFluoridesGlass Ionomer CementsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver CompoundsTooth, DeciduousTooth DemineralizationDental Stress AnalysisFluorides, TopicalFluoride TreatmentHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingShear StrengthCariostatic AgentsFluoridesFluorides, TopicalGlass Ionomer CementsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver Compoundssilver diamine fluoridesilver fluorideBond strengthDental cariesGlass ionomer cementsPrimary dentitionSilver diammine fluoride

Identifiers

PMID42319399
PMCPMC13593656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.