ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in post-traumatic and previously operated knees with retained hardware: Practical decision-making workflow.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after periarticular fracture fixation, malunion, high tibial osteotomy, or other previous knee surgery differs substantially from routine primary TKA. Retained implants, extra-articular deformity, distorted landmarks, bone defects, scarred soft tissues, and infection risk may all compromise standard instrumentation and implant positioning. Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) is increasingly used in selected non-standard primary cases because computed tomography -based or imageless planning can define deformity, anticipate implant-hardware conflicts, guide bone resection, and quantify gap balance. However, the available evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, consisting mainly of case reports, small case series, and early retrospective comparative cohorts. This scoping review synthesizes clinical evidence on RA-TKA in post-traumatic and previously operated knees with retained or recently removed hardware. It also integrates relevant navigation and hardware-removal literature to propose a practical workflow for patient selection, imaging, hardware strategy, robotic execution, implant escalation, intraoperative safety checks, and implementation. Current literature supports technical feasibility and suggests potential workflow advantages in carefully selected cases, particularly when landmarks are unreliable, intramedullary instrumentation is blocked, or three-dimensional planning may clarify implant-hardware conflict. These findings should not be interpreted as evidence of proven superiority. Comparative evidence remains sparse, and follow-up is short. Current data do not establish improved survivorship, lower infection risk, better patient-reported outcomes, or cost-effectiveness. RA-TKA should therefore be framed as a planning and execution adjunct, not as a stand-alone solution for complex conversion-style primary TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.