Observational studyEuropean stroke journal2026
Diagnostic performance of prehospital large-vessel occlusion detection scales in patients with suspected acute stroke: a retrospective validation study. The Akershus Study of Ischemic Stroke and Thrombolysis.
Observational study in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05378490 (The Akershus Study of Ischemic Stroke and Thrombolysis -1), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Akershus Study of Ischemic Stroke and Thrombolysis -1 (ASIST-1) Epidemiology, Clinical and Radiological Presentation and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke Mimics in a Norwegian Population
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrehospital stroke scales are widely used to identify patients with suspected stroke. The scales have shown potential to identify suspected large-vessel occlusion (LVO) for direct-to-thrombectomy triage, yet it remains unclear which scales perform best, and whether performance varies by patient characteristics. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, we analysed 1150 consecutive adults admitted under the stroke code protocol at a primary stroke centre (January 2015-December 2017). The cohort included ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, intracerebral haemorrhage and mimics. We evaluated 55 scale-threshold combinations (46 scales) for detection of computed tomography angiography (CTA)-confirmed LVO, quantified by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
resultsIn our study population, LVO prevalence was 13.5%. AUC ranged from 0.586 (Hemiplegia) to 0.855 (FAST-ED). No scale significantly outperformed the continuous National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, AUC 0.851) after Bonferroni correction, and none achieved both sensitivity and specificity above 80%. Scales combining cortical and motor items outperformed purely motor-based instruments. Accuracy was comparable between sexes but higher for left-hemispheric strokes (mean AUC: 0.82 vs 0.76) and patients aged ≥60 years (0.82 vs 0.77). DISCUSSION: None of the prehospital stroke scales were accurate enough to reliably detect LVO. Performance varied with stroke laterality, patient age and stroke severity-approaching chance levels at the extremes of severity and showing a consistent hemispheric bias.
conclusionThis highlights fundamental limitations of using clinical scales alone to detect LVO in real-world stroke code populations. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05378490, NCT05378490.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.