Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319227›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026

Selective removal of visual working memory items at test.

Chong Zhao, Temilade Adekoya, Sintra Horwitz, Edward Awh, Edward K Vogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chong ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-5528
Temilade AdekoyaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Sintra HorwitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Edward AwhDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Edward K VogelDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS ROIMH087214Office of Naval Research N00014-12-1-0972Office of Naval Research N00014-23-1-2768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) tasks often require comparing remembered items to test displays, but little is known about how people selectively remove irrelevant information at test. Across three experiments, we used contralateral delay activity (CDA) to track WM load and examine selective removal. In Experiment 1, CDA amplitudes increased with set size even when only one item was probed, suggesting minimal removal based on spatial location. Experiment 2 ruled out spatial grouping by presenting items sequentially in the same location, yet more items were retained for larger set size. In Experiment 3, however, when items belonged to distinct mnemonic categories, CDA amplitudes at test were reduced, consistent with selective removal based on category relevance. Additionally, P3 old-new effects showed that decision speed and strength were influenced by the number of items maintained. Together, these results suggest that people selectively remove WM contents based on categorical relevance, not spatial cues, enabling more efficient memory-based decisions.

Indexed as

BrainMemory, Short-TermVisual PerceptionAdultCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultCDAEEGERPremovalworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42319227
PMCPMC13280942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.