ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2026
Simulation use in perfusion education: A 2025 survey of United States programs.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulation-based education (SBE) is increasingly used in training students in allied healthcare, yet data on its role in United States (U.S.) perfusion programs are limited. This study surveyed perfusion programs with the purpose of assessing simulation use, curricular integration, challenges, and future directions.
methodsA 22-question validated survey was distributed via REDCap to all 23 perfusion program directors in the U.S. between March and April 2025. Questions addressed demographics, simulation infrastructure, curricular integration, challenges, and future directions.
resultsThe response rate was 100%. All programs use at least one simulation modality, and 82.6% use high-fidelity simulation. Most programs (69.6%) fully embed simulation into credit-bearing courses, and 73.9% grade student performance. 60.9% of programs report that they have a dedicated simulation space. 56.5% report a lack of a dedicated budget. Common challenges identified were time constraints (73.9%) and limited faculty manpower (65.2%). While all programs teach adult CPB using simulation, the incorporation of pediatric CPB, ECMO, and IABP simulation is less common.
conclusionSBE is widely adopted in perfusion programs across the U.S., but standardization, faculty training, and curricular integration are necessary to optimize its impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.