SynthesisTransplantation2026
Impact of Intrapatient Immunosuppression Variability in Renal Transplantation Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntrapatient variability (IPV) is the changes of a drug's blood trough concentration in a patient. There is a lack of consensus on whether high IPV is associated with poor outcomes in transplantation.
methodsSeveral electronic databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, served as sources for the literature search. Covidence facilitated the sorting and extraction of data. The meta-analysis was conducted using R Studio.
resultsAbout 5210 studies were identified in initial database searches, with 41 articles ultimately included in this review. We reviewed outcomes, including acute rejection, chronic rejection, allograft survival, patient survival, and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). Numerous papers supported the conjecture high IPV was associated with increased rejection rates and worse allograft survival rates, while for patient survival, chronic rejection, and dnDSA development results were equivocal regarding the effect of IPV. Meta-analysis showed that patients with low IPV had a 44% lower risk of acute rejection compared with patients with high IPV (RR = 0.56). Patients with high IPV had an increased risk of graft loss, HR = 2.42 (95% CI, 1.70-3.46).
conclusionsOur analysis showed that acute rejection and allograft survival are impacted by high IPV. In conclusion, this study establishes high IPV as a significant modifiable risk factor for acute rejection and graft loss, warranting its integration into routine clinical monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.