ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Tracing the Satisfactory Care of the Chronically Ill in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThe growing prevalence of chronic diseases has heightened the demand for emergency department (ED) services, underscoring their increasingly essential role within healthcare systems. To improve outcomes and decrease needless ED use, it is essential to comprehend what constitutes appropriate care in this context. METHODOLOGICAL
designA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Relevant studies published between 2013 and 2024 were identified through systematic searches conducted in PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus. The methodological approach was based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework, further refined by Levac et al. and Peters et al., and complemented by the Framework 'N' to integrate principles of caring science and patient-centred care within the synthesis process.
resultsFifteen studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. Four overarching motifs emerged from the thematic synthesis. (1) Health systems: Age and multimorbidity are the main causes of ED dependence. This emphasises the necessity of service reform and customised care programs. (2) ED use and care transitions: Results are enhanced by functional evaluation, timely pain management and organised follow-up. Delays and disjointed aftercare, however, are frequent. (3) Interdisciplinary collaboration: Coordinated multidisciplinary teams and integration with primary care enhance patient satisfaction and continuity. Nevertheless, these methods are rarely used. (4) Barriers and challenges: Errors, undertreatment and repeated ED visits are caused by stigma, poor staff training, a lack of resources and poor communication.
conclusionsStronger integration between emergency departments (EDs) and primary care, along with standardised procedures and individualised care pathways, is essential in response to population aging and the increasing complexity of chronic diseases. Prioritising digital technologies, enhancing staff training and improving care transitions can not only enhance patient outcomes and experiences but also reduce avoidable ED visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.